Canon CanoScan FB620P scanner preliminary report
Feb. 5/99
I just recently bought a Canon CanoScan FB620P scanner after being
disappointed by the UMAX 1220P scanner. Like so many other Canon
products I've tried, I was impressed with this one for the price,
but there are some shortcomings. The price was $215. Canadian on
sale plus tax, less a manufacturers rebate of $80., bringing the
price down to $135 plus tax (not bad for a scanner of this quality).
I submitted the rebate coupon beyond the deadline, but Canon paid
it to me anyway (after a little chasing). I haven't finished testing,
but preliminary results are encouraging & the Canon scanner
seems to have few of the problems I mention in my UMAX
1220P report (except that scan times were about the same). Here
is what I've found so far.
As you'll see if you click here,
the scan resolution of the CanoScan FB620P is noticeably sharper
than the UMAX 1220P & almost the equal to the older but more
expensive HP Scanjet 3C. This should probably come as no surprise
since Canon's area of expertise is optics (though this Canon scanner
doesn't use a traditional lens & mirror). I found the Canon
CanoCraft CS-P software to be more versatile than the UMAX VistaScan
software & it had a much larger preview window as well as automatic
white balancing. The size of the Canon scanner is considerably smaller
than the UMAX (because of the new CIS imaging technology) making
it easier to find a place to put it. There is only 3/4" from
the glass to the edge of the cover, which also makes it a little
easier to position a book on the scan glass. There was no dirt,
debris & greasy finger prints on the underside of the scan glass
like there was in the UMAX scanner. The Canon documentation was
very good & even was honest enough to note that certain printers
might not work properly with this scanner (my HP Deskjet 500 printer
worked fine). The CanoScan FB620P scanner has an optical resolution
of 600 DPI & a color bit depth of 30 (although I only need 24).
An 8.5" X 11" picture at 300 DPI took about 2:27 minutes
(147 seconds) to scan in, or with ColorGear Color Matching turned
on about 2:52 minutes (172 seconds).
Some recent magazine articles have suggested that the new CIS (Contact
Image Sensor) light & image pickup technology (used in the CanoScan
FB620P)(Canon calls it LIDE for LED Indirect Exposure) is not yet
as good as the older CCD (charge-coupled device) semiconductor chip
imaging technology (used in the UMAX 1220P). My experience so far
indicates that the resolution of the Canon CanoScan FB620P CIS imager
is higher, white/black balanced is better & color accuracy is
at least as good as the UMAX 1220P scanner, BUT some new problems
have showed up. Here is a reference to these two types of scanning
technologies http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/scanners98/ccdvscis.html
The white & black balance was better than the UMAX. Click
here to see a stepped gray scale comparison of white & black
balances between the UMAX & Canon scanners. I did
notice a slight posterization look on solid gray areas & this
showed up on the waveform monitor when I used the stepped gray pictures
for video, but the video pictures looked fine. I also noticed solid
grays have subtle vertical streaks (probably from inconsistencies
in the CIS array). These two gray scale problems may be the same
thing & at least one magazine article I've read on this scanner
has indicated that gray scale performance on this scanner is weak.
I would be inclined to agree, but color performance is quite good.
Here is a magazine review on this Canon scanner http://www.computers.com/reviews/comparative/capsule/0,26,84-2023-643997-683393,00.html?st.co.crr.txt.crc683393
I've found that the new CIS imaging technology has extremely
limited depth of focus because no lens is used. If
the item scanned is not directly in contact with the scan glass,
it will be out of focus. Click
here to view samples of
a cell phone scan by the Canon & UMAX scanners. It seems
that for normal pictures the Canon does a better job & for pictures
or objects that don't sit flush with the scan glass, the UMAX (or
any scanner with a CCD, lens & mirror) does a better job. I
guess at this low price you're not going to get everything.
The Canon (parallel port) scanner did not disable my HP Deskjet
500 printer, although an Inscriber Feature Pak HASP dongle I was
using on the parallel port did interfere with the Canon scanner
until I changed the motherboard BIOS off the "standard"
parallel port setting to the ECP setting. I also noticed that once
I had opened the CanoCraft CS-P software, it disables Inscriber,
even if Inscriber was already up & running first. I get an Inscriber
error message that says "1) block error". The cause of
the problem was the HASP dongle. If I reboot, then I can use Inscriber
again as long as I don't open the Canon scanning software. The manufacture
of the HASP dongle (Aladdin Knowledge Systems)claims that their dongle
is completely transparent to other devices, but obviously it isn't.
They sent me a parallel port plug in ISA card so I will have two
parallel ports as a workaround for the problem their dongle causes
with Inscriber when the Canon software is opened. Note that this
problem was not caused by the Canon scanner or software.
There is a size lock feature in the Canon software that I really
like. You can choose the target size (say 720 X 540) & LOCK
it to that. Then when you drag the scan box size to cover the area
of the preview picture you want to scan, the box aspect stays the
same as it changes in size & the scan resolution (DPI or %)
automatically adjusts to fit what's needed to achieve the resolution
target. After that, all I have to do is scale it down to 720 X 486
in PhotoShop before I use it for video.
There is also a nice little software feature called ColorGear Color
Matching which enhances the picture to have more saturated colors
should you want that. Here are examples
of how it changes the picture.
I have found with this or any scanner, that you often get a better
quality picture if you scan it at 600 DPI, then scale it down in
Photoshop to the required size. This is particularly true if you
are scanning coloured printed material. Sometimes you might even
have to apply a blur (under Filter/Blur) in Photoshop for certain
halftoned printed material.
The Canon scanner also comes with CanoCraft CS-P Copy software
which allows you to use your scanner & printer like you would
a copy machine. When set to the high resolution scanning resolution,
I found that it did a pretty good job in TEXT or GRAY scale mode.
By Doug Hembruff.
Last updated Feb. 20/99
|