Dave Russell and I met with our OTIP representative recently to get updated
on the status of the District 11 Long Term Disability cases. We learned some
interesting things about trends over the last decade. Apparently, the number
of LTD cases relating to mental and nervous disorders, including workplace
stress, in Ontario had been steadily rising for most of the last decade.
However last year, for the first time, there was an overall decline in the
number of stress-related cases. It is interesting to note that this
statistic also coincides with the defeat of the tory government and their
relentless war on teachers and education workers.
That said, we are heading into the last week before the Christmas holidays
when, typically, stress levels sometimes are elevated, and we have received
some calls recently about members in conflict with each other and so I
wanted to share some information with the membership in an effort to prevent
or help solve conflicts in the workplace.
The OSSTF Constitution and Bylaws and Policies require professional conduct
and respect among members.
The OSSTF Constitution, Bylaws and Policies are available online and it
would be well worth every member’s while to read through the “Ethics”
section in Bylaw 4 (pages 13-14) and the “Rights, Privileges and Duties of
OSSTF Members” section in Bylaw 5 (pages 14-16).
ETH 3.3 says, “The member's professional conduct should be characterized by
courtesy and good faith, and should imply the obligation to refrain from
public criticism of the member's colleagues.”
Whether it be the relationship between members of the same bargaining unit,
or between members of different employee groups, or between the member and
administration, students or parents, it is always the best policy to treat
each other with courtesy and respect. It is never all right to speak
disparagingly of our fellow members or of other board employees. If these
very simple principles are followed, we should be able to avoid conflicts.
Furthermore, the Teaching Profession Act Section 18 (1) (b) and OSSTF Bylaws
5.2.1.2 and 5.2.2 require a member who has made an “adverse report” about
another member to administration to give a copy of that adverse report, in writing, to that
member within 72 hours. This, of course, can be unpleasant and so it is much
preferable to try to prevent situations from getting to that point.
The more daily “people contacts” one has, the higher the inherent stress
level is. Because of this, we must be that much more aware of the potential
for stress and seek ways to deal effectively with it. Rather than criticize
members with different ways of doing things, or those with whom we disagree,
it is much more constructive to actively seek ways of getting along and
problem-solving with them.
The OSSTF motto, “Let us not take thought for our separate interests, but
let us help one another,” and the OSSTF pledge sum it up best:
"I solemnly dedicate myself to promote and advance the cause of education.
I will strive to achieve and maintain the highest degree of professional
competence and will always uphold the honour, dignity, and ethical standards
of my profession.
I pledge my loyalty and support to the Ontario Secondary School Teachers'
Federation and will comply with the Constitution, Bylaws, Policies, and
established practices which govern its members."
As members of OSSTF, we are responsible for fulfilling our professional
obligations to the best of our ability and for working together for our
students and for public education. We must support and help each other as
colleagues.
This mentoring role is especially important for members with Positions of
Added Responsibility. While members with Positions of Added Responsibility
may assist members of their department with work performance and who may be
having difficulty, it is important to note that this is a supportive,
mentorship role only; not an evaluative one. Further information about this
role can be found in the OSSTF Policy and Procedure Manual in Policy 2.3.3
(pages 1-2).
|